AI prelims seed the field so nobody waits on a bye. You climb through human elimination rounds on video, and the AI judge writes a full ballot for every round you debate. Format-accurate across Asian Parliamentary, WSDC, British Parliamentary, APDA, PF, LD, and Policy.
Registration is open. Grab a slot, pick the side you want to be tested on, and you are on the field. You can hold spots in more than one at a time.
Rounds in progress. Open a bracket to follow the field advance in real time. Your own matchups sit at the top of the sheet.
Finished tournaments and the debaters who took them. Every final was settled by the AI judge on the flow, with the reasons published on the ballot.
One bracket, three stages. The engine handles seeding and judging so a small field still runs like a real invitational.
Every entrant debates two or three rounds against a format-tuned AI. Speaker points and win record seed you into the bracket, so nobody sits out waiting for a partner.
The top seeds advance to live video rounds against other debaters on your motion and format. Timer, POIs, and speech order run exactly as the format expects.
The judge adopts the paradigm the format calls for, honors any agreed instructions, and writes the reason for decision. The ballot is public, so the result is arguable.
Nothing during beta. The prize is a spot on the board, a verifiable DebateIt credential for a deep run, and a bracket you can point to. No buy-ins, no cash.
No. The prelim rounds run against the AI, and the elimination bracket matches you to other entrants. Team formats pair you inside the tournament.
Asian Parliamentary, WSDC, British Parliamentary, APDA, PF, LD, and Policy. Each keeps its own speech order, timing, and evidence rules the whole way through.
Prelims seed you; they do not cut you. A rough prelim just means a lower seed, and a lower seed can still run the table. The elimination rounds are where it counts.